national network for child carenavigation bar Home Newsletters E-mail Forum Articles & Resources About National Network Search

HEAD START AND THE COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SYSTEM

Charles A. Smith
Interim National Program Leader, Human Development
Extension Service-USDA

Copyright/Access Information


Effective collaboration depends on an understanding and appreciation of organizational cultures, including the structure, goals, strengths, and weaknesses of potential organizational partners. Organizations that can compliment each other's strengths, offset each other's weaknesses, and
pool resources to achieve common goals are likely to achieve more than what they might accomplish alone. Head Start and the Extension System are obviously quite different in how they are funded and structured. They do, however, have significant common goals that are more likely to be achieved through collaboration. This brief report provides an overview of Head Start for Extension educators at county, state, and federal levels who would like to begin or strengthen a partnership with Head Start.


BACKGROUND

Since its inception in 1965 as a comprehensive child development program, Head Start has served more than thirteen million low-income children and their families through the provision of education, health, social services, parent involvement, and disability services. Head Start began in the spirit of experimental social reform, a national laboratory of the very best and most innovative in child and family services. The program is located in the Department of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. It is found in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Outer Pacific Islands, and in nearly 150 Tribal Nations. A detailed set of Head Start Program Performance Standards is the principle vehicle for
monitoring Head Start's quality.

Federal funds allocated to Head Start flow directly to community agencies on a grant application basis. In 1993 Head Start was able to serve approximately 721,000 children and their families through a network of more than 2,000 grantees and delegate agencies operating some 36,300 classrooms and over 600 home-based programs. To be eligible for Head Start a child must be living in a family whose income is below the federal poverty line, $14,350 for a family of four as of August, 1994. The majority of Head Start children are from single-parent families. Sixty-three percent are four years old; 27 % are three years old, 3 % under three years of age, and 7 % are five years old. A minimum of 10 % must be children with disabilities. The racial/ethnic composition of the program nationally is 36 % African American, 33 % Caucasian, 24 % Hispanic, 4 % Native American, and 3 % Asian.


HEAD START CULTURE

Extension educators who wish to collaborate with Head Start should keep four key characteristics in mind:

1. Head Start is for families, not just for young children. From its very beginning, Head Start has had a family focus. Parent involvement is a critical and integral part of Head Start. "Head Start's vision for parent involvement is to create and sustain an environment of partnership and collaboration across all elements of the Head Start Program which: supports parents as primary educators, nurturers and advocates; assures that every parent has an opportunity for a significant experience in Head Start; and, assures the policy making role of parents which is the foundation of Head Start's unique success" (Head Start Parent Involvement: Vision, Opportunities, and
Strategies, 1993, p. 1). Performance standards of potential interest to Extension educators include:


2. The focus in Head Start is on family strengths. Parents and children are valued and respected. Every parent is encouraged to contribute by becoming involved in the Head Start program. A sense of family belonging and safety is part of the historical fabric of Head Start. With its diversity of programs throughout the country, Head Start is clearly a multicultural program.

3. Head Start views itself as a potential resource to the community. Head Start programs develop leadership and advocacy in parents. Successful programs encourage parents to become involved in their communities, to translate the self-confidence they gain in Head Start by working to make their communities a better place for families.

4. Head Start is primarily decentralized with limited federal involvement in grantee programs. Local programs operate with budgets that are eighty percent federal dollars and twenty percent a required non-federal match. Because of the emphasis on local control and
parent involvement, Head Start is characterized by a strong sense of loyalty by those involved in the program.


THE FUTURE

In creating a 21st Century Head Start the Advisory Committee on Head Start Quality and Expansion made three recommendations, the first emphasizing excellence, the second, expansion and the third, partnerships.

Increasing parent involvement is one of the steps to expanding to better meeting the needs of children and families. "The 1993 Head Start Improvement Act included a provision which requires every Head Start agency to provide parents of children participating in the program with child development and literacy skill training in order to help their children reach their full potential." (p. 43)

In terms of partnerships, the committee affirmed that "We must encourage Head Start to forge partnerships with key community and state institutions and programs in early childhood, family support, health, education and mental health, and we must ensure that these partnerships are constantly renewed and recrafted to fit changes in families, communities, and state and national policies." (p. 23)

Expansion also includes moving to full day and full year services (an obvious need for working parents) and serving families with younger children. Transition Projects, model programs that establish effective transitions from the Head Start classroom to elementary school, are also a priority.


IMPLICATIONS FOR EXTENSION

Head Start and Extension have much to gain from a collaboration. Our two organizations have sufficient similarity to make them compatible. We both seek to strengthen families, we both emphasize local control and involvement, we both have respect for the potential contributions of
parents participating in our programs, and we both value diversity.

Extension can benefit from a collaboration with Head Start by gaining access to frequently underrepresented audiences for its educational programs. Motivated parents could be invited to serve on program development committees that provide community oversight to Extension
programming. We can learn from Head Start parents and staff about the needs of low-income children and families.

Head Start can use Extension resources to help parents learn about parenting, family finance, and
childhood nutrition. Because of their familiarity with county government and expertise in leadership development, Extension educators can help nurture the types of advocacy skills in parents so valued by Head Start. In some locations, Extension could provide significant parent education services for Head Start programs. In addition, county and state Extension offices can often provide access to a variety of electronic databases focusing on children and families. Extension's National Network on Child Care, for example, could help connect Head Start
programs to expertise throughout the System.

Collaboration could be nurtured at both the local and federal levels. ES-USDA professionals could meet with Head Start Bureau professionals to keep them informed of new programs and materials of potential interest to their grantees, teachers, and parents. Joint projects of mutual benefit could be initiated. At the local level, county Extension educators could work with Head Start directors in their area to explore how Extension resources (materials and people) could be of benefit to the Head Start program.

Head Start and Extension collaboration is not a new concept. For example, in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, the Head Start grantee recently collaborated with the University of Wisconsin Extension to offer a Family Time program to Head Start families. A pre- and post-test assessment was designed by Extension, the results to be used by the Head Start project's evaluation team. Many other Extension educators throughout the United States are working closely with their Head Start programs. With encouragement and a better understanding of their Head Start partner, such collaboration could expand and become even more effective.


BIBLIOGRAPHY

Advisory Committee on Head Start Quality and Expansion, Creating a 21st
Century Head Start. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, 1993.
Kracke, K., Head Start Parent Involvement: Vision, Opportunities and
Strategies. Washington, D.C.: The Head Start Bureau, 1993.
Zigler, E. and Muenchow, S. Head Start: The Inside Story of America's
Most Successful Educational Experiment. New York: BasicBooks, 1992.

I would like to thank Karen DeBord of the University of Missouri
Cooperative Extension Service and Frankie Gibson of the Head Start
Bureau, Administration for Children and Families, for their suggestions
for improving this publication.



DOCUMENT USE/COPYRIGHT
National Network for Child Care - NNCC. Part of CYFERNET, the National
Extension Service Children Youth and Family Educational Research Network.
Permission is granted to reproduce these materials in whole or in part for educational purposes only (not for profit beyond the cost of reproduction) provided that the author and Network
receive acknowledgment and this notice is included:

Reprinted with permission from the National Network for Child Care -
NNCC. (1994) Smith, C.A. Head Start and the Cooperative Extension
System
. pp. 1-4. Washington, D.C.: USDA - Extension Service


Any additions or changes to these materials must be preapproved by the author.

AVAILABLE FROM::
Charles A. Smith
Cooperative Extension Service
343 Justin Hall
Kansas State University
Manhattan, KS 66506-1423
Phone:: (913) 532-5773
Fax:: (913) 532-6969
e-mail:: casmith@ksuvm.ksu.edu


FORMAT AVAILABLE:: Print - 4 pages
DOCUMENT REVIEW:: Level 2 - State Review
DOCUMENT SIZE:: 14K or 4 pages
ENTRY DATE:: October 1994

Contact Us | Non-discrimination Statement and Information Disclosures | © Iowa State University, 2002